Saudi Arabia

Human rights organizations remained banned under the Law on Associations. Human rights defenders and activists continued to be arbitrarily detained, harassed in detention or subjected to arbitrary travel bans that restrict their freedom of movement. Dozens continued to serve prison terms for their human rights work.

In March, Raif Badawi, a blogger and activist, was conditionally released after serving a 10-year prison sentence for creating an online forum for public debate for which he was accused of insulting Islam. A 10-year travel ban began on his release, as part of his sentence.

Mohammad al-Qahtani, a human rights defender and founding member of the Saudi Civil and Political Rights Association, was denied family contact from October until the end of the year. In May, he was assaulted by another prisoner held with him in the same ward who had mental health problems.

The authorities sentenced to death and executed individuals convicted of murder, robbery, rape, drug smuggling and terrorism-related crimes following grossly unfair trials. In February, the Saudi Human Rights Commission told Amnesty International that the country no longer executed individuals “for crimes committed by minors” and had commuted all such outstanding sentences. However, between June and October, the SCC and another criminal court upheld the death sentences of three young men who were under the age of 18 at the time of the capital crimes.

In the single largest mass execution in recent decades, 81 men – citizens and foreign nationals – were executed on 12 March. According to the Ministry of Interior, those executed were convicted of a range of offences, including terrorism-related crimes, murder, armed robbery and arms smuggling. Some of those executed were also convicted of “disrupting the social fabric and national cohesion” and “participating in and inciting sit-ins and protests”, which describe acts that are protected by the rights to freedom of expression, peaceful assembly and association. Of those executed, 41 were from Saudi Arabia’s Shi’a minority.

In November, the authorities executed 20 people for drug-related crimes, the first such executions since the Saudi Human Rights Commission announced a moratorium on the use of the death penalty for drug-related crimes in January 2021.

In April, the Supreme Court upheld the death sentences against two Bahraini Shi’a men for “terrorism” and protest-related charges. They were arrested on 8 May 2015 and held incommunicado and in solitary confinement for three-and-a-half months. In October 2021, the SCC had sentenced them to death after a grossly unfair trial. In the event that the king ratifies their sentences, they would face the risk of imminent execution.

In March, Abdullah al-Huwaiti, who was arrested when he was 14, was re-sentenced to death by the criminal court in Tabuk city, after the Supreme Court overturned in November 2021 a previous death sentence against him that was handed down in October 2019. In June, an appeals court in Tabuk upheld the death sentence. During his time in detention, Abdullah al-Huwaiti was held in solitary confinement, denied access to a lawyer and forced to “confess” under duress. He was tried on charges that included armed robbery and the murder of a security officer.

From January to October, the authorities subjected thousands of residents, including foreign nationals, to forced evictions in Jeddah as part of a mass demolition and eviction plan to develop the city. A state-aligned media outlet announced on 31 January a compensation scheme for citizens that excluded foreign nationals, who made up 47% of those evicted. Residents were given notice of between one day and six weeks. The project plans had been finalized almost three years earlier, but the authorities failed to engage in genuine consultation with residents, provide adequate notice, announce the amount of compensation or provide it to residents prior to the demolitions.

In July, in a limited reform of the kafala sponsorship system, the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development announced two new conditions under which domestic workers are allowed to change employers without the permission of their current employer: if the employee terminates the labour contract during the probation period; and if there is proof that the services of the employee had already been transferred to another employer without the knowledge or consent of the previous employer. However, the new conditions do not protect migrant domestic workers from other abuses that they continued to face, including verbal and physical abuse, passport confiscation and irregular or non-payment of wages. Domestic migrant workers continued to be excluded from protections under the country’s labour law.

The authorities continued their crackdown on individuals accused of violating residency, border and labour regulations through arbitrary arrests, and forcibly returned tens of thousands of Ethiopian migrants solely based on their irregular immigration status (see Torture and other ill-treatment heading below).

According to the Ministry of Interior, between January and November, at least 479,000 foreign nationals were returned to their home country out of 678,000 arrested for “violating labour, residency and border security” regulations. During that same period, 14,511 foreign nationals, most of them Ethiopians and Yemenis, were arrested for crossing the border irregularly from Yemen into Saudi Arabia.

Saudi Arabian authorities arbitrarily detained Ethiopian men, women and children for up to 18 months in inhumane conditions and tortured and otherwise ill-treated them before forcibly returning them to Ethiopia, most of them between April and May, solely for their irregular immigration status. They were held in overcrowded cells with inadequate access to food, water, sanitation and healthcare in two detention centres prior to their deportation. At least 12 men died.

In March, the Council of Ministers passed a new Personal Status Law, which came into effect in June. The new law, which was not previously codified, enables discrimination against women, including through male guardianship. Only men can be legal guardians under this law, and women must have a male guardian’s permission to marry and are then obliged to obey their husband. Moreover, the law does not give women and men equal rights over matters relating to their children in the event of separation. While the mother is automatically granted custody, the father is designated as the child’s legal guardian without due consideration of the best interests of the child.10 Failure to tackle climate crisis The government had still not announced a new NDC.